D. Mr lorry is close friends with Dr. Manette,but lorry is unsympathetic you to Lucie.
I hope I’m correct
The last answer option is correct. This option states that:
"You definitely have an insider’s view on this situation. Evidence from your own life shouldn’t be used to analyze another writer’s story, though."
<h2>Why would this be the peer reviewer's suggestion?</h2>
- A peer reviewer is someone who will give suggestions.
- These suggestions aim to make the text more coherent, efficient, and meaningful.
- In this case, a peer reviewer will give suggestions and how to improve the text and will show the author what should be removed or added.
In the case of the text Jaime, the peer reviewer must show how he cannot infer about the life of another writer based on evidence from his personal life. However, this inference must be made through evidence from the writer's own life.
More information about reviews in the link:
brainly.com/question/20466874
Answer:
1
Explanation:
Although nr. 2 and 3 are considered to be good reasons too, the first reason is the only one that really matters, due to the importance of improving work and study opportunities in a society where only high qualified - and fluent in English - persons count. 4 is interesting from a social point of view but won´t help the individual much in his/her future career.
Explanation:
Astronomers have identified more spiral galaxies than ellipticals, but that's simply because the spirals are easier to spot. While spiral galaxies are bright, elliptical galaxies are dim. The existing stars inside an elliptical galaxy tend to be older, giving off more red light than younger stars.
