Answer:
gold,crops, crisis, poverty
Answer:
$9,800,000
Explanation:
Statement of Cash Flows (Indirect Method)
Particulars Amount
Net income $8,400,000
Add: Adjustment for operating activities -<u>$1,300,000</u>
Net cash flow from Operating Activities (I) $7,100,000
Add: Net Cash Flow from Investing Activities (II) -$1,300,000
Add: Net Cash Flow from Financing Activities (III) <u>$4,000,000</u>
Net Cash Flow (I+II+III) <u>$9,800,000</u>
Answer:
Explanation:
Based on the scenario being described within the question it can be said that in this situation the analyst should focus on fully disclosing all of the available data and show that, while sales remain strong, the company must address its customer service situation. That is because customers are the heartbeat of the company and without them the company will ultimately go bankrupt.
Answer:
$2,250 favorable
Explanation:
The direct material price variance is computed as;
= ( Standard price - Actual price ) × Actual quantity
Given that;
Standard price = $8.75
Actual price = $8
Actual quantity = 3,000 units
Direct material price variance
= ( $8.75 - $8 ) × 3,000
= ( $0.75 ) × 3,000
= $2,250 favorable
Answer: False
Explanation:
When the government subsidies production of a good, it leads to a rise in the supply of the good. The supply curve shifts down to the right leading to a <em>fall in the price level</em>. But the <em>equilibrium quantity increases</em>.
Thus, the given statement is false that if the government decides to subsidize the production of a good, the result would be a decrease in the equilibrium price and a decrease in the equilibrium quantity.
