This part of the speech is effective since it conveys Britain's confidence in their Navy and the possibility of winning the war, as further explained below.
<h3>What is the purpose of the speech?</h3>
The speech "Their Finest Hour" by Winston Churchill has the purpose of conveying the idea that it is possible for Britain to win the war. For that reason, the part of the speech that we are analyzing here is effective. It implies that the British Navy deserves to be trusted, whereas Italy's and Germany's are not as good they they used to be.
Therefore, this part of the speech helps compose the speech as whole and serves as another point or argument in the process of claiming that Britain can win the war. The speech is, thus, inspiring and reassuring, as is its purpose.
With the information above in mind, we can conclude that the answer provided above is correct.
Learn more about purpose here:
brainly.com/question/10336721
#SPJ1
Prejudice arises when a large number of people decide to believe and promote an incorrect and harmful concept about a group of people. Within this context, we can say that MacCarthy was not the only one to blame for the Red Scare of the 1950s.
We can arrive at this answer because:
- Senator MacCarthy was one of those most responsible for the fear of communism, which occurred in a generalized way in the country in the 50s.
- This dread was so intense, that this era is known as the Red Scare or era of McCarthyism.
- Although Senator MacCarthy was the representative face of this moment, he was not the only one responsible for spreading this fear in society, as the American media and other politicians reinforced this idea.
MacCarthy promoted controversial speeches and spurred the indictment and punishment of people suspected of communism. These speeches were stimulated by the media, causing unjustified prejudice and a wave of oppression and unfounded accusations.
In addition to MacCarthy, other senators and politicians embraced this prejudiced concept against communism and encouraged laws, speeches, comments, and other activities that gave Red Scare strength. Some of these politicians were Richard M. Nixon, Karl E. Mundt, Patrick A. McCarran, among others.
More information about McCarthyism:
brainly.com/question/17606205
I believe the term would be liberation, to liberate, is to receive freedom I believe.
Answer: With their collaboration and dialogue they are advancing the plot.
Explanation:
Interaction between Montresor and Fortunato is the only thing that is advancing the plot because there is not much happening besides their dialogue. In their dialogue, we can see the hint that is showing us that the letter would be ruined and demised.
Montresor is wanting the revenge and he is trying to set a diabolical scheme because of it which is showing us contradictory in him because he is saying something that doesn't approve his acts. Since the story is told from his perspective, we are more likely on his side and we are empathizing with him.
Montresor is telling to Fortunato that he has something that is mistaken for Amontillado and that is a light Spanish sherry. After that, Fortunato is saying that he has forgotten his family's motto which is "No one attacks me with impunity" and after that, he is quitting the interaction and answering to him when he is saying “For the love of God, Montresor!”.