Answer:
No, it is not.
Step-by-step explanation:
comparing the two given values, 1.75 and 6, estimating 1.75 for 6 is not reasonable. This is due to the fact that converting 1.75 to the nearest whole number gives 2 which is far away from 6. Since,
6 - 2 = 4
So, estimating 1.75 for 6 would involve a large value of error. Which make it unreasonable. It would have been more reasonable to estimate 1.75 for 2.
Answer:
x=11
Step-by-step explanation:
(4x)+(3x+13)=90
if you look at the beam, it includes a 90 degree angle.
7x+13=90
distributive property
7x=77
subtracted both sides by 13
x=11
divided both sides by 7 to isolate x
4(11) 3(11)+13
44 33+13
36
4(x) is the larger angle
A = 7x, c = 4x, s = 3x
a = s+52
7x = 3x+52
4x = 52
x = 13
c = 4x = 52
Caroline gets 52.
Answer:
1
Step-by-step explanation:
to be honest ion even kno big dawg
Answer:
B. (6,2) and (3,0)
Step-by-step explanation:
To find the slope the equation is so for (6,2) and (3,0) the equation would look like this which simplies down to and a negative divided by a negative is a positive so you're slope is and it matches the question.