Well as x can never actually be -1 because I'm in the denominator -1 + 1 = 0 and we cannot divide by zero. But we can look at what number it approaches and i assume that is the relative value. sometimes functions will have asymptotes and others will have holes in the graph. this one would have an asymptote going down at a rapid rate. the asymptote would go on forever getting infinitely close to -1 but never touching. So I would say since the asymptote goes down forever that the graph approaches negative infinity
2/10 because 0.7/7 is equal to one tenth, so 1.4/7 is equal to 2/10
Answer:
50 total
Step-by-step explanation:
when it's asking for a total you add the numbers together, and whatever number you get is your answer :)
sorry if it's wronggg :( !!
Answer:
C. a higher monthly payment.
Step-by-step explanation:
<h3>Answer options:</h3>
Rate adjustment resulted in
<u>A. a lower interest rate.
</u>
- No, interest rate increased from 0.4 to 0.5 percent
<u>B. a higher principal.
</u>
- No, principal decreased from $200000 to $187000
<u>C. a higher monthly payment.
</u>
- Yes, monthly payment increased from $1059.85 to $1162.56
<u>D. a higher number of payments.</u>
- No, number of payments remained as 336
In accordance with <em>propositional</em> logic, <em>quantifier</em> theory and definitions of <em>simple</em> and <em>composite</em> propositions, the negation of a implication has the following equivalence:
(Correct choice: iii)
<h3>How to find the equivalent form of a proposition</h3>
Herein we have a <em>composite</em> proposition, that is, the union of <em>monary</em> and <em>binary</em> operators and <em>simple</em> propositions. According to <em>propositional</em> logic and <em>quantifier</em> theory, the negation of an implication is equivalent to:
To learn more on propositions: brainly.com/question/14789062
#SPJ1