Answer:
The postponement of a project until conditions are more favorable:
III. could cause a negative net present value project to become a positive net present value project.
Explanation:
With the favorable project conditions, the negative NPV will be revised to a positive NPV because the positive conditions will ensure the generation of positive cash inflows. The result is that the project will be assessed as acceptable since the net present value will become positive. Generally, favorable project conditions create outcomes that are positive for the cash flows, thereby generating more positive cash inflows and reducing the impact of cash outflows.
Answer:
Tammi's liability is d. limited to her investment in the stock.
Explanation:
Since Tammi has purchased a stock in a corporation, one of the fundamental property of a corporate is that the stock-holders of the corporation have a limited liability meaning shareholders are only legally responsible for the debts of a company only to the extent of their investment in the company.
So Tammi's liability is limited to her investment in the stock of Vivaldi Corporation.
Answer:
The answer is: Edgar will receive $37,000
Explanation:
- Dowd's share of the company's losses is $80,000
- Edgar's share of the company's losses is $60,000
- Frost's share of the company's losses is $40,000
- Grant's share of the company's losses is $20,000
But since Grant is not willing to give more money to the partnership to cover his losses, the $9,000 difference must be divided by the remaining three partners. So they will divide Grant's losses as follows:
- Dowd's share of the Grant's losses is $3,600
- Edgar's share of the Grant's losses is $2,700
- Frost's share of the Grant's losses is $1,800
Then you add up all the losses the three remaining partners had:
- Dowd' total losses $83,600
- Edgar's total losses $62,700
- Frost's total losses $21,800
So when the partnership was dissolved, Edgar should have received $100,000 (capital) - $62,700 (total losses) = $37,200
I selected answer A since they probably rounded down Edgar's share to $37,000 (nearest possible choice).
Answer:
The correct answer that fills the gaps are: constant
; increasing.
Explanation:
GDP per capita, income per capita or income per capita is an economic indicator that measures the relationship between the level of income of a country and its population. For this, the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) of said territory is divided by the number of inhabitants.
The use of per capita income as an indicator of wealth or economic stability of a territory makes sense because through its calculation national income is interrelated (through GDP in a specific period) and the inhabitants of this place.
The objective of GDP per capita is to obtain data that somehow shows the level of wealth or well-being of that territory at a given time. It is often used as a measure of comparison between different countries, to show differences in economic conditions.
Answer:
d. interpersonal justice
Explanation:
Interpersonal justice -
It refers to the practice of treating the people with proper respect and dignity , is referred to as interpersonal justice .
In case of any harmful , serious condition or activity , the practice of communicating or resolving the issue with the people in a very kind and respectful manner , is the sign of an intelligent or smart person .
Hence , from the given scenario of the question ,
The correct option is d. interpersonal justice .
