I’m pretty sure it would be the narrator’s dilemma
Answer:
Scout is able to narrate historical moments and very broad social causes of American society, while Rachel narrates only from her own perspective.
Explanation:
Although Scout and Rachel are very punctual and efficient narrators in presenting their perspectives, thoughts and emotions about the experiences and events they witnessed, they differ in a very important point. This point is the historical and social factor.
Rachel narrates only the facts that are directly related to her, while Scout narrates the facts about her, about historical events and about very broad and impacting social causes in American society. Scout has the ability to narrate prejudice, about southern society, about intolerance, about religious hypocrisy, about incorrect judgment, racism and other causes.
Answer:
Like I could say no but yes at the same time bc sometimes they know exactly what they are doing and do it anyways but no bc there still young but I might say yea
Answer:
- Sharing videos can create feedback loops that lead to poor decision-making.
- An "all-about-the-likes" sense of values can negatively influence decisions.
- Brain development and online pressure can lead to impulsivity.
Explanation:
The words in bold have a negative connotation, supporting the claim that social media is harmful to teens.
- Sharing videos can create feedback loops that lead to poor decision-making.
- An "all-about-the-likes" sense of values can negatively influence decisions.
- Brain development and online pressure can lead to impulsivity.