Michigan v. Tyler was the Supreme court ruling that they violated when
warrantless search was done.
<h3>Michigan v. Tyler case</h3>
The Court of Appeals of the State of Michigan affirmed the conviction for the
exception of a warrantless search only in the case of an arson.
In this case, there was no arson involved which is against the rule of law as
various items (stolen money, illegal weapons, drugs) were only searched for.
This thereby violates the U.S. Supreme Court ruling between Michigan v.
Tyler.
Read more about Michigan v. Tyler case here brainly.com/question/1622038
Answer:
The volume is 13, 69 L
Explanation:
We use the formula PV=nRT. We convert the temperature in Celsius into Kelvin and the pressure in mmHg into atm.
0°C= 273K---> 56°C= 56 + 273= 329K
760 mmHg----1 atm
719 mmHg----x= (719 mmHgx 1 atm)/760 mmHg= 0,95 atm
PV=nRT ---> V= (nRT)/P
V=( 0,482 molx 0,082 l atm/K mol x 329K)/0,95 atm
<em>V=13,68778526 L</em>
Answer is: a. Rubidium (Rb) is more reactive than strontium (Sr) because strontium atoms must lose more electrons.
The ionization energy (Ei) is the minimum amount of energy required to remove the valence electron, when element lose electrons, oxidation number of element grows (oxidation process).
Alkaline metals (group 1), in this example rubidium, have lowest ionizations energy and easy remove valence electrons (one electron), they are most reactive metals.
Earth alkaline metals (group 2), in this example strontium, have higher ionization energy than alkaline metals, because they have two valence electrons, they are less reactive.
Rubidium electron configuration: ₃₇Rb 1s²2s²2p⁶3s²3p⁶3d¹⁰4s²4p⁶5s¹; one valence electron is 5s¹ orbital.
Strontium electron configuration: ₃₈Sr 1s²2s²2p⁶3s²3p⁶3d¹⁰4s²4p⁶5s²; two valence electrons is 5s² orbital.
is there supposed be a picture with the question?
Answer:
false
true
true
Explanation:
false - changing the hypothesis to meet your needs is not a good researcher
true - when you can further analyze and explain then you have a successful experiment even if it's not what you expected
true - successful experiments do not end there. they can lead to more in depth questions.