Sick my ppgghf was fever gmyhrr the centnulPimi I’m
Answer:
Pure risk
Explanation:
To the best of knowledge, will it is a situation one finds him/herself in and doesn't know how to solve the issue but has only one possible outcome if it truly happens; which could be danger.
Answer:
I'm spending WAY too much money on my favorite snack which are purple Doritos. / The Dorito company is having a huge shortage of my favorite snack which are the purple Doritos and I don't know what to do!
Explanation:
Remember what economics is when you are asked this question. Economics basically are along the lines of distribution and consumption of goods could mean internationally or it could just mean in your state. If you have a favorite snack that you like to buy from stores whenever you go to them, you buying and taking that snack is basic economics, you have a demand for that product because you like it so much, and they (owners of the snack) have a supply of that demand so you then spend money (currency) in order to get that demand or snack which is basic economics. A problem in this scenario would be you spending too much money on your favorite snack, or the supplier of that snack is having a shortage and you can't buy your favorite snack as much as you want.
Hope this helps.
Answer:
The answer is B. Ethan has more experience than Karen.
Explanation:
Now, lets take each Answer option separately and see why only B is correct.
Option A is no longer legally accepted or ethical. Perhaps during the era of segregation back in 1960s' this option could have been acceptable. But today it is illegal and is considered as a violation of basic human rights.
Option C is not correct as well because although people with special needs and physical requirements are entitled to receive certain special treatments, paying them more solely based on their disability is not considered suitable nor ethical.
Option D is unacceptable. No one can assume that men have more stamina than women. There are competent, strong and qualified women who can do their jobs much better than men. So we cannot accept this as an answer.
Option E is incorrect as well. Although a person could be an immigrant, once that person has lawfully taken the citizenship of a country, that "immigrant" is considered as a "citizen" of that country (this is not applicable for illegal immigrants!).
However, we can take option B as the answer. This is because when comparing a new employee with a more experienced employee, we can't see any problem in paying the experienced employee more.
Answer:
<u>The correct answer is C. US$ 30,000</u>
Explanation:
1. What was the operating income for the period?
Operating income = Net sales - Cost of goods - Operational expenses
Operational expenses on this question are:
- Selling. general, and administrative expenses
- Interest expenses
- Research and development expenses
- Income tax expense
According to the information provided, we have then:
Operating income = 390,000 - 220,000 - 80,000 - 16,000 - 34,000 - 10,000
Operating income = 390,000 - 360,000
Operating income = 30,000
<u>The correct answer is C. US$ 30,000</u>
<u></u>
