Answer: We can find out the missing statement with help of below explanation.
Step-by-step explanation:
We have a rectangle ABCD with diagonals AC and BD ( shown in given figure.)
We have to prove: Diagonals AC and BD bisect each other.
In triangles, AED and BEC.
( By alternative angle theorem)
( Because ABCD is a rectangle)
( By alternative angle theorem)
By ASA postulate,
By CPCTC, and
⇒ BE= ED and CE=EA
By the definition of bisector, AC and BD bisect each other.
Answer:
see explanation
Step-by-step explanation:
To prove that BC ≅ AD, that is that BC = AD
You would need to prove the lengths are the same.
Answer:
11.8
Step-by-step explanation:
I think it is subtracting fractions.
First you turn the fractions into decimals then subtract it. After, you turn the decimal to a fraction but i am having a hard time doing that... the decimals by the way is 12.5 and 0.7 according to converters
Answer:
the 1/2 part of it is 1/2
Step-by-step explanation:
thus f[ g(x) ] = x indeed, or g[ f(x) ] =x, thus they're indeed inverse of each other