Answer:
$687,000
Explanation:
Intangible Assets are identifiable assets of a non-monetary asset and without physical substance. Intangible assets include trademarks, copyrights and goodwill that is acquired.
Important to note that Internally generated Goodwill is not defined as an assets. Thus, deposits with advertising agency of $35,000 are not included within tangible assets
<u>Calculation of Total Intangible Assets will be :</u>
Intangible Assets Calculation = (Copyrights) $ 58,000 + (Goodwill Acquired) $560,000 + (Trademarks) $69,000
= $687,000
Therefore,
Sandhill's balance sheet as of December 31, 2021 should report total intangible assets of $687,000
1. Because only 25% of the foreign investment went from MDCs to LDCs.
2. Money is not invested evenly among LDCs (most money went to China).
Answer:
A remote company or Telecommuting company
Explanation:
Telecommuting (also known as working from home, or e-commuting) is a work arrangement in which the employee works outside the office, often working from home or a location close to home
Traditionally, the formulas used to express a firm's cost of equity are the dividend capitalization model and the capital asset pricing model (CAPM).
Explanation:
Generally, two risk components determine a firm's cost of equity. The first is the systematic risk associated with the broader equity market. All firms are exposed to this risk, and it cannot be mitigated through diversification.
The second risk component is the unsystematic risk associated with the firm in question. This risk, often reflected as beta, a measure of the stock's volatility in relation to the volatility of the broader market, can be mitigated via diversification.
Explanation:
Looking from a fair point of view, the White owners of businesses have legitimate reasons to feel that the Act constitutes illegal reverse discrimination.
Remember, reverse discrimination implies an unfair treatment of the majority group (White owners) in an effort to please the minority group. This is evident from the fact that the 10 percent of all federal grants to be released by the Economic Development Administration was only to be used to purchase services or supplies from businesses owned and controlled by U.S. citizens belonging to one of six minority groups excluding the White business owners; making the White owners feel discriminated against.
Thus, unintentionally the Act became a reverse discrimination on White business owners.