The crossover point is that production quantity where total costs for one process equal total costs for another process. Hence, option D is correct.
<h3>What is crossover point?</h3>
Financial independence is secured when investment income exceeds regular income. In financial jargon, this is known as the "cross over point."
When the production expenses for one product are the same as those for another product, there is an added benefit to selling any product because the cost is the same and the income will be higher from each unit, independent of the number of units sold.
Thus, option D is correct.
For more details about crossover point, click here:
brainly.com/question/13845784
#SPJ4
All options are missing firm the question-
a. variable costs of one process equal the variable costs of another process.
b. fixed costs of a process are equal to its variable costs.
c. total costs equal total revenues for a process.
d. total costs for one process equal total costs for another process.
e. the process no longer loses money.
Answer:
The firm will not sell any bundle, the amount of bundle to be sold will be zero.
Explanation
Solution
Since firm sells at $25 each for coats and pants, then If consumer wants to purchase both Pant and Coat, the customer will have to pay 25 + 25 = $50.
Also, If consumer purchase Pant and Coat as a Bundle then, he will pay 150. From the question stated we can conclude that their is a form of interest to pay for Pant and Coat for Both consumers are higher than 25.
However, they will have to pay an amount less for 1 coat and 1 pant if they buy this in a separate way instead of a Bundle.
We can say, that type of consumers (both) will not buy the pants and coat as a bundle, but will want to buy them separately.
Therefore, any bundle will not be sold by firm. the amount of Bundle sold will be known as a zero Bundle
Answer:
C) if the court finds that Shawn has substantially performed, he will be able to recover the contract price less any damages caused by his failure to perform as promised.
Explanation:
From the question Harry signed a contract with Shawn to build a house. Harry made some specification to build the house. But Shawn did not follow the specifications now Harry doesn't want to pay him the contract amount.
Under doctrine of specific performance, Harry can pay less money than the contract price. Because Shawn has performed substantially, he is not entitled to receive the contract price as agreed.