Answer:
A) $56,750
Explanation:
Since Manning's ownership changed during the year, it must allocate income differently for the first 40 days than the remaining 325.
Kane should report the following income:
- 100% income form Manning x 40/365 = $73,000 x 40/365 = $8,000
- 75% income from Manning x 325/365 = $73,000 x 75% x 325/365 = $48,750
- total income allocated to Kane = $8,000 + $48,750 = $56,750
Yes you are correct the cost pool is the people cost object is the product
Answer:
bigger is the correct answer.
Explanation:
Answer:
The net pay for John Jansen is $2894
Explanation:
For calculating the net pay for John Jansen we have to subtract all the FICA taxes and federal income taxes and also state income taxes, with authorized voluntary deductions also being subtracted from the gross earnings .
Given information - Gross earning = $4000
FICA taxes = 7.65%
Federal income taxes = $675
State income taxes = 3%
Authorized voluntary deductions = $5
One important to remember here is that FICA taxes and State taxes would be calculated on the gross earnings of John
FICA taxes = 7.65% of $4000
= .0765 x $4000
= $306
State taxes = 3% of $4000
= .03 x $4000
= $120
NET PAY = gross earnings - FICA tax - state tax - federal income tax -
authorized voluntary deduction
= $4000 - $306 - $120 - $675 - $5
= $2894
Answer:
B. The portfolio expected rate of return must be the same for each economic state.
Explanation:
Variance formula = sum of (probability x (r - mean)^2)
r= expected return
if the expected return would be same for each economic state then the mean would equal to expected return which ultimately will give variance zero ( as r-mean would be 0).
Hence the correct option is B. The portfolio expected rate of return must be the same for each economic state.