The best rebuttal to this anti-burn viewpoint is this:
- Without the controlled fire, more fuel may have built up, leading to greater damage.
<h3 /><h3>What is a rebuttal?</h3>
A rebuttal is a rejection of a previously stated claim. In the passage above, the claim is that the controlled fire caused significant losses to the people and environment.
But if there is a rebuttal that claims that the controlled fire was helpful because it greatly limited the reach of the burn, then we can consider that as a valid rebuttal.
A rebuttal is meant to find a fault in the claim and gives a reason why the opposite of the claim is accurate.
Learn more about rebuttals here:
brainly.com/question/24690335
#SPJ1
