Answer:
Both affirm that ideas in the text have been proven by previous experience.
Explanation:
The author always tries to appeal audience with its artwork. Both the passages have similarities in their ending in a way that both the texts have proven past experience to affirm and back their ideas. This makes passage more appealing to the audience as the text is backed by some factual events.
Answer:
Explanation:
"Wait for me!" Emma called.
If this is about H.D.'s poem "Sea Rose", then the answer is the olfactory sense (sense of smell).
In the last stanza, we've got the second contrast in the poem (the first one was "a wet rose single on a stem"): a "spice rose", which is a particular kind of rose, very lavish and beautiful. "Acrid fragrance" is a unique feature of the sea rose that the speaker talks to, and she doubts that this spice rose can have it. In other words, even though the sea rose is "harsh" and "marred", atrophied, destroyed by the sand and the winds, it still has a more distinct and beautiful smell (even though it is acrid) than a regular, nurtured, home-grown rose.
Answer: Change could to can.
Explanation: Its gramatically correct in casual talk, so if not my answer then it would probably be 'no change is needed'.
I hope this helped! :)
Number 3 is right Archetypal criticism