Because a decrease in real autonomous spending results in a <u>fall</u> in the price level, the ultimate effect on real GDP is<u> smaller</u> that predicted by the multiplier.
Another significant discovery is made by Keynesian economics. You've learnt that Keynesians think fluctuations in total spending are what ultimately determine the level of economic activity in the short run (or aggregate demand).
Assume that full employment prevails in an economy because the macro equilibrium occurs at the potential GDP.
Keynes noted that even while the economy starts at potential GDP, it is improbable that it will stay there because aggregate demand has a propensity to fluctuate.
In 2007, the collapse of the housing market caused a decline in U.S. investment spending. The Great Recession subsequently hit the American economy as a result.
To learn more about Keynesian here
brainly.com/question/17247821
#SPJ4
Managers often use a(n) utilitarian approach when making organizational decisions - using financial performance such as profit as the best definition of what constitutes an ethical choice for the company.
<u>Explanation:</u>
When decisions are taken by taking benefits and the costs that are associated with stakeholders into consideration is an utilitarian approach. The main thing that is considered in this approach for taking any decision is consideration of the outcome and net result of the action that is to be taken.
It aims in taking an action that has greater good for many number of people and less harm for lesser number of people. It considers both the people who gets benefits and those people who suffer from the decision. It mainly focus on choosing an alternate that is more ethical and produces a good balancing of benefits than harm.
Answer:
The correct answer is False.
Explanation:
This statement is false, since the residual theory of dividends argues that these are irrelevant, that is, that the value of the company is not affected by its dividend policy. The main drivers of this theory are Modigliani and Miller. Both authors affirm that the value of the company is determined solely by the profitability and the degree of risk of its assets (investments), and that the way in which the organization divides its income between dividends and reinvestment does not have a direct effect on its value .
However, some studies show that significant changes in dividends affect the price of shares in the same direction, that is, increases in dividends translate into increases in stock prices, and vice versa. In response, M and M propose that the positive effects of dividend increases be attributed, not to the dividend itself, but to the informational content of dividends with respect to future income. Thus, any increase in dividends would cause investors to raise the price of the shares, while a decrease would cause a corresponding decrease in the price of the shares.
Answer:
1
Db Salaries expenses__4000
Cr Accrued salaries__________4000
Accrued on December 31
Explanation:
Accrued salaries refers to the amount of liability remaining at the end of a reporting period for salaries that have been earned by employees but not yet paid to them.
Weekly payroll 5000
Day payroll 1000
Monday-Thursday 4000
1
Db Salaries expenses__4000
Cr Accrued salaries__________4000
Accrued on December 31
Answer:
The answer is: Garnett Co.'s net income is $7,600
Explanation:
To determine the net income we must first calculate the cost of goods sold and the commissions paid:
- COGS = $50,000 x 40% = $20,000
- Commissions = $32,000 x 10% = $3,200
Now we can elaborate the following income statement for Garnett Co.
Total sales $32,000
COGS ($20,000)
Commissions ($3,200)
<u>Advertising expense ($1,200) </u>
Net income $7,600