Answer: It supported the District Court’s decision that the students’ constitutional rights had not been violated.
Explanation:
The case of Ingraham v. Wright was heard in 1976 in the Supreme court based on an event that happened in 1970 where James Ingraham was paddled by the principal of a public high school in Florida to the point of needing medical assistance.
The district court the case was first heard in dismissed it and the Court of Appeals upheld this dismissal.
The Supreme court then agreed with the District court in saying that corporal punishment did not infringe upon Constitutional rights so the students’ constitutional rights had not been violated.
Answer:
The agent probably knew about the murderer, because the accused only bought a ticket to return from the trip.
Explanation:
When the friend bought the travel tickets, he did not buy two tickets back, but only one, that is, he knew that his friend would not return, although he did buy two one-way tickets. Thus, this individual becomes the main suspect in the murder, since only the two friends were on the trip and it is necessary to investigate all the possibilities of his friend's death.
In this case, the police contacted the travel agent who passed all the ticket purchase information between the two friends.
Answer:
I was surprised by his sense of humour.
Explanation:
I don't have much idea about passive voice but I tried
Right……..
U know u need to add the statements right?
