In my opinion it does. The more water the pot holds, the longer you need to wait for it to freeze. Since there is more water, some parts may not be completely frozen. An experiment you can try is to get an ice cube container and a pot. fill both of them and put them in the freezer for the same amount of time. When you take it out, the ice cubes should be frozen leaving the pot with cold water.
Answer:
Part a)
Part b)
Since the distance of other building is 15 m so YES it can make it to other building
Part c)
direction of velocity is given as
![[tex]\theta = 26.35 degree](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Btex%5D%5Ctheta%20%3D%2026.35%20degree)
Explanation:
Part a)
acceleration due to gravity on this planet is 3/4 times the gravity on earth
So the acceleration due to gravity on this new planet is given as
now the vertical displacement covered by the canister is given as
now by kinematics we have
Part b)
Horizontal speed of the canister is given as
now the distance moved by it
Since the distance of other building is 15 m so YES it can make it to other building
Part c)
Final velocity in X direction will remains the same
final velocity in Y direction
now magnitude of velocity is given as
direction of velocity is given as
The presence of helium gas indicates the radioactive sample is most likely decaying by α-decay, or alpha decay. α-decay is the type of radioactive decay in which an atomic nucleus emits α particles. α particles are Helium nuclei. So the correct answer would be α-decay.
Answer:
I don't know sorry For this question
Answer:
No
Explanation:
In such situations we cannot determine which one is more valid as both serves the purpose well.
Two theories are carried out in different environment and circumstance keeping different parameters and one can opt for any number of ways to carry out that experiment but what matter at the end is the accuracy they bring.
Each of the theory is a new discovery and follows all the possible logical rules hence it is not possible to decide which one is more valid.
