Answer:
The amount Lava should charge against income during year 4 is $63,000.
Explanation:
Since amortization is assumed to be recorded at the end of each year, this can be calculated as follows:
Annual amortization expense = Cost of the patent / Patent's estimated useful life = $90,000 / 10 = $9,000
Amortization expense recorded prior to year 4 = Annual amortization expense * 3 years = $9,000 * 3 = $27,000
Unamortized cost of patent charge against income during year 4 = Cost of the patent - Amortization expense recorded prior to year 4 = $90,000 - $27,000 = $63,000
Therefore, the amount Lava should charge against income during year 4 is $63,000.
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "C": Orientation.
Explanation:
The primary organization-specific factors are <em>orientation, size of the organization, </em>and<em> degree of centralization</em>. Orientation <em>refers to the function of a company that controls the decisions in regards to purchases</em>. The size of the organization implies decision making will be more centralized in larger firms while more decentralized in smaller firms. Finally, the degree of centralization states that even in highly autonomous corporations, some purchases might be subject to the approval of a manager who confirms the need for the assets being acquired.
<em>Because in Anchor Inc. the purchase decisions are made by engineers the orientation organization-specific factor is more relevant in that company</em>.
Answer:
increases; increases
Explanation:
A cut in tax rate has numerous advantages and disadvantage to the economy both in long-run and short-run. A cut in tax rates increases the discretionary cash flow of people, which drives them to expand their utilisation spending. A cut in charge rates increment the size of the multiplier impact
Explanation:
Qualitative analysis;
The given case belongs to real options in finance terms where the project offers tangible assets in comparison to financial instruments.
The project is of real option. The value of any real option would be more when:
- the project under consideration is very risky
- With respect to timing option value, there is time to change the decisions
Having said that, since project is risky and investment can be made later, hence it would be more feasible to wait and observe
