Given:
<span>accounts receivable of $244,000
allowance for uncollectible accounts of $1,350 (credit)
1% of the accounts receivable should be the value of the allowance for uncollectible accounts.
244,000 x 1% = 2,440
2,440 - 1,350 = 1,090
Adjusting entry:
Debit Credit
Bad Debt Expense 1,090
Allowance for uncollectible accounts 1,090</span>
Answer:
Company should continue with old machine (Alternative 1)
Explanation:
Preparation of a differential analysis dated April 11 on whether to continue with the old machine (Alternative 1) or replace the old machine (Alternative 2)
DIFFERENTIAL ANALYSIS
Continue with old machine(Alternative 1) ; Replace with old machine(Alternative 2); Differential effect on income
REVENUES
Proceeds from sale of machine
$0 $50500 $50500
COSTS
Purchase price $0 -$75000 -$75000
Direct labor -$56000 -$37000 19000
(11200*5 = -56000)
(7400*5 = -37000)
Income (loss) -$56000 -$61500 -$5500
Based on the above differential analysis the Company should continue with OLD MACHINE (Alternative 1)
Answer:
True
Explanation:
A single use plan is basically a one time business transaction that is supposed to take place only once and should not be repeated in the future. In this case, the production plant has been used for more than 100 years, but once it is sold, its history and the company should no longer have any type of relationship with it.
A document that purports to be an agreement but does not include all necessary terms is known as a void contract. Therefore, choice 3 is right.
<h3>What do you mean by a contract?</h3>
A contract is defined as a commitment to do something between two or more parties. A loan arrangement between automobile purchasers and sellers is an illustration of a contract.
An arrangement between two persons to get married is an example of a contract.
A formal contract that is effectively void and unenforceable from the moment it is created is known as a void contract.
Hence, the correct option is Void contract to be filled in given blank
Learn more about contracts:
brainly.com/question/2669219
#SPJ1
RULE 1.7 CONFLICT OF INTEREST: CURRENT CLIENTS
(a) Except as provided in paragraph (b), a lawyer shall not represent a client if the representation involves a concurrent conflict of interest. A concurrent conflict of interest exists if:
(1) the representation of one client will be directly adverse to another client; or
(2) the representation of one or more clients may be materially limited by the lawyer's responsibilities to another client, a former client, or a third person, or by a personal interest of the lawyer.
(b) Notwithstanding the existence of a concurrent conflict of interest under paragraph (a), a lawyer may represent a client if:
(1) the lawyer reasonably believes that the lawyer will be able to provide competent and diligent representation to each affected client;
(2) the representation is not prohibited by law;
(3) the representation does not involve the assertion of a claim by one client against another client represented by the lawyer in the same litigation or other proceeding before a tribunal; and
(4) each affected client gives informed consent, confirmed in writing.