I am not completely sure but looking up the definition for all of them the closest fit in the blank is C, skimming. Hope this helps you.
Answer:
The answer is "False".
Explanation:
False, they are not following the alliance strategy because alliance strategy exhibits the process that works for mutual benefits. Alternatively, it occurs when at least two organizations join hands together for mutual benefit but in the question, a firm finds a way to increase the costs of its competitors. Therefore, this is not the case of alliance strategy.
Answer:
The correct answer is attribute-based evaluation.
Explanation:
The products are susceptible to an analysis of the tangible and intangible attributes that make up what can be termed as their personality.
This analysis is carried out through the evaluation of a series of factors that allow dissection of the product, starting from the central elements to the complementary ones, so that in view of both ours and those of the competition, we can elaborate the marketing strategy that allows us to position the product in the market in the most favorable way. In any case, the different factors that we include below have to serve us only as a script or reference, since depending on the product that we commercialize other totally different attributes will be studied.
Answer: <em>Oligopolistic Competition</em>
Explanation:
Here, in this particular case we can state that the competition that persists in this scenario is <em>Oligopolistic Competition. </em>It is referred to as the situation in a market under which there tend to be only few sellers that further sell a differentiated product, here the seller tends to have higher percentage of market control and thus they further cannot allow themselves to disregard the conduct of other sellers.
The ability of an organism to change in its environment. It applies to development by environmental interactions and neural changes influenced by learning.