Answer:
I used the most recent figures of the international property rights index (year 2019), and the most recent GDP per capita estimamtes by the IMF in purchasing power parity. (year 2019)
Three countries with high scores, with GDP per capita (PPP):
- Finland - score of 8.712 - U$ 46.430
- Switzerland - score of 8.571 - U$ 64.649
- United States - score of 8.202 - U$ 62.606
Three countries with low scores, with GDP per capita (PPP):
- Ukraine - score of 4.432 - U$ 9.283
- Pakistan - score of 3.874 - U$ 5.680
- Haiti - score of 2.703 - U$ 1.864
The pattern that we find is that there is a strong correlation between the International Property Right Index scores and the GDP per capita figures. This is consistent with the findings in other similar rankings such as the Global Competitiveness Report, published by the World Economic Forum, and the Economic Freedom Index, published by the Heritage Foundation.
What can be interpreted is that property rights, and the strong enforcement of those property rights promote economic development and growth. This is because the protection of private property stimulates human action. For example, the United States has a strong judiciary, and rule of law. In this country, people can invest their money in a project with the certainty that those invesments will not be expropriated by an arbitrary judiciary. This promotes development because investing leads to higher economic output.
Those same incentives do not exist in countries that do not enforce property rights, and that is one of the main reasons why they are poor.
Answer:
A. Is the same as convergence of accounting standards
Explanation:
Harmonization of accounting standards mean the process of increasing the compatibility of accounting practices by setting bounds for the degree of variations.
The notion of harmonization can be replaced by the concept of convergence.
Harmonization of international accounting standards is an imposition of standards by economically superior countries.
Answer:
D. Tasha: "If coffee drinkers expect the price of coffee to rise next month, then current demand will go up and lead to a price increase this month."
This is the only one with incorrect economic analysis
Explanation:
A. is correct because a shortage of supply would drop the price as we can see in the Graph 1 with the supply curve.
B. is correct because if the two goods are substitues then a lower price for caffeinated soft drinks like Mountain Dew would cause the consumer demand for coffe to go down because the consumers would prefer the good with lower price, rising the demand for Mountain dow in detriment of coffe.
C. is correct as we can see in the Graph 1, the increse in the demand would generate a higher price but it would make the demand go back to D1
D. is incorrect because if coffee drinkers consume more coffee this monht the price would lower.
Overstaffed is "having more members of staff than are necessary" and overhired is "hiring too many employees".
The correct answer is BOE *]
