Answer:
The expected profit is -$13,162.
I would not recomend the investor to make this investment.
Explanation:
The expected profit can be calculated multypling the probabilities of every outcome and the profit of each outcome, and substracting the total invevstment.
The outcomes are:
1) probability 0.39 of a $23,000 loss,
2) probability 0.24 of a $8700 profit,
3) probability 0.12 of a $31,000 profit, and
4) probability 0.25 of breaking even
NOTE: It is assumed that the outcomes does not include the initial investment.
Then, the expected profit of this investment is:
Answer:
The owner will maximize value if it waits 29th years Assuming 5% continuos inflation
Explanation:
the price formula for the future years is:
while it is adjusted for inflation at:
so the complete formula for value is:
Now, we can derivate and obtain the roots
Getting at a root exist at the 29th year.
The owner will maximize value if it waits 29th years Assuming 5% continuos inflation
Answer:
planning publicity strategies and campaigns. writing and producing presentations and press releases. dealing with enquiries from the public, the press, and related organisations. organising and attending promotional events such as press conferences, open days, exhibitions, tours and visit.
Based on the information given the current ratio is:1.4.
<h3>Current ratio</h3>
Using this formula
Current ratio=Current assets/Current liabilites
Where:
Current assets=$191,800
Current liabilities=$137,000
Let plug in the formula
Current ratio=$191,800/$137,000
Current ratio = 1.4
Inconclusion the current ratio is:1.4.
Learn more about current ratio here:brainly.com/question/2686492
Answer:
One company pays 100%, the other re-reimburses 50%
Explanation:
If an environmental assessment found that the two companies share joint and several liability for a hazardous materials cleanup.
What could happen if the two of them don't agree to cooperate in the cleanup is that one of the companies will eventually settle the costs fully while the other party will have to reimburse the party that pays, 50%.
The paying company could make claims because the environmental impact assessment has already found both companies jointly liable. hence each company ought to jointly share the costs