Answer:
$725000
Explanation:
The break-even point is the point at which the firms total expenses is equal to its total revenue and it neither makes a profit nor a loss. At any point before this, the firm makes a loss and at any point after this, the firm is making a profit. This is because, it has got to a point where after the unit variable costs are covered from the revenue, there is enough to cover fixed costs as well because the firm’s fixed costs are now being spread over a greater number of units.
The break-even point is calculated as:
Fixed costs / (Selling price per unit - variable cost per unit)
Hence, in this case : $253750 / ($100 - $65) = 7250 units.
In dollars, this would be...
Revenue : 7250 x $100 = $725000
Expenses : $253750 + ($65 x 7250) = $725000
Answer: Trustee's Deed
Explanation: A trust deed in immovable property in the Americas refers to a legal instrument used to develop a significant stake in the immovable property under which legal title in capital assets is diverted to a trustee holding that as security for such a loan between a creditor and perhaps a lender.
From the perspective of the investor, a document of trust has a vital benefit as compared to a mortgage. If a borrower fails to pay on the loan, on part of the lender, the trustee has the right to repossess the land. Thus, from the above we can conclude that Maya would have been given a trustee's deed.
You mutiply the outside number by the 1st number on the inside of the paranthesis
Answer:
$64,000
Explanation:
In order to be deductible, a business expense must be both ordinary and necessary. Being ordinary means that it is a plausible expense for this business, since the expense in question is related to accounting services, it is ordinary. Being necessary means that the expense is the minimum required and is appropriate and helpful to the business. In this case, all of the expense was not required, therefore, only $64,000 (the reasonable market value for the services provided) are deductible.
Answer: Sarah failed to evaluate a potential ethical issue.
Explanation:
From the question, we are informed that Sarah who is the controller of a large beverage supplier, supervises two employees and that her boss, Vladimir, told her to increase the company's inventory balance for an amount that is material to the financial statements by crediting several small "miscellaneous" expense accounts.
We are further told that Sarah does not know the reason behind this but told one of her staff to make them because she has been instructed to do so.
We can see that Sarah failed to evaluate a potential ethical issue. She didn't evaluate the effect of what she is doing. In this case, what her boss told her to do could be a case of fraud and she just obliged without asking questions which will put her conscience at ease in case anything happens but the fact that she just did it without asking questions or thinking if what she has done is morally right or wrong, it shows that Sarah failed to evaluate a potential ethical issue.
