how each of these "w"? im guessing it means work. and three weapons from then that are "new"? are:
Rifles. All nations used more than one type of firearm during the First World War. The rifles most commonly used by the major combatants were, among the Allies, the Lee-Enfield .303 (Britain and Commonwealth), Lebel and Berthier 8mm (France), Mannlicher–Carcano M1891, 6.5mm (Italy), Mosin–Nagant M1891 7.62 (Russia), and Springfield 1903 .30–06 (USA). The Central Powers employed Steyr–Mannlicher M95 (Austria-Hungary and Bulgaria), Mauser M98G 7.92mm (Germany), and Mauser M1877 7.65mm (Turkey). The American Springfield used a bolt-action design that so closely copied Mauser’s M1989 that the US Government had to pay a licensing fee to Mauser, a practice that continued until America entered the war.
Machine guns. Most machine guns of World War 1 were based on Hiram Maxim’s 1884 design. They had a sustained fire of 450–600 rounds per minute, allowing defenders to cut down attacking waves of enemy troops like a scythe cutting wheat. There was some speculation that the machine gun would completely replace the rifle. Contrary to popular belief, machine guns were not the most lethal weapon of the Great War. That dubious distinction goes to the artillery.
Flamethrowers. Reports of infantry using some sort of flame-throwing device can be found as far back as ancient China. During America’s Civil War some Southern newspapers claimed Abraham Lincoln had observed a test of such a weapon. But the first recorded use of hand-held flamethrowers in combat was on February 26, 1915, when the Germans deployed the weapon at Malancourt, near Verdun. Tanks carried on a man’s back used nitrogen pressure to spray fuel oil, which was ignited as it left the muzzle of a small, hand-directed pipe. Over the course of the war, Germany utilized 3,000 Flammenwerfer troops; over 650 flamethrower attacks were made. The British and French both developed flame-throwing weapons but did not make such extensive use of them.
there are many more, but here are 3 i found from a trustworthy source!
Answer:
$17,877
Explanation:
initial outlay = ?
net cash flows years 1 to 5 = $3,000 - $400 = $2,600
net cash flows years 6 to 10 = $3,000 - $800 = $2,200
assuming that the discount rate is 6%, we need to determine the maximum amount of initial investment that would result in the NPV = 0
in order to do this we have to calculate the present value of the future cash flows:
PV = $2,600/1.06 + $2,600/1.06² + $2,600/1.06³ + $2,600/1.06⁴ + $2,600/1.06⁵ + $2,200/1.06⁶ + $2,200/1.06⁷ + $2,200/1.06⁸ + $2,200/1.06⁹ + $2,200/1.06¹⁰ = $17,877
that means that the maximum amount that can be invested = $17,877, and that way the NPV = 0
Answer:
D. $ 10,300
Choice D is correct: Net income = $ 10,300
Explanation:
Cash Received = $ 16000
Less Rent Paid= ( $ 2000)
Add income = $ 3000
Less Salaries for the month of March = ($ 6200)
Less utilities paid ($ <u>500)</u>
<u>Net income=</u> $ 10,300
Treatments.
Net income is found by deducting expenses from revenues earned
$ 100,000 is the retained earnings so it is not accounted for net income.
Equipment is an asset so it is not accounted for net income.
Cash received is the revenue so it is accounted.
Rent is an expense account so it is subtracted.
Income for service $ 3000 provided is also taken into account on matching principle basis.
Advance received will be adjusted when the services will be rendered on matching principle.
Answer:
$21.42
Explanation:
The computation of fixed component in the predetermined overhead rate is shown below:-
Fixed component in the predetermined overhead rate = Fixed Overhead ÷ Machine Hours
= $87,822 ÷ 4,100
= $21.42
Therefore for computing the fixed component in the predetermined overhead rate we simply divide the fixed overhead by machine hours.
And all the other information i.e given is not relevant. Hence, ignored it
Answer:
b. $5,000
Explanation:
<u>September 26th</u>
1,000 x 5 = 5,000 stock rights Investment
It receive 1,000 right at $5 dollars each the total is 5,000
This rights were detachable from the stocks, so they have a diferent account, they are independent from the common shares purchased on March 4th
