The slippery slope fallacy is something that many people fall into while writing something persuasive. This fallacy mostly happens when it is a primarily emotional argument with no factual support. The way it works is you make a claim that isn't entirely true, and then you base the rest of your argument on this point, even more "facts" off of this one slightly true fact you have stated. An example of this would be: "We can't allow people to go treasure hunting. By going treasure hunting people are more likely to trespass on other people's land in order to find treasure. By making trespassing less serious, people will start to loss their sense of other people's privacy. As you can see, if we allow people to pursuer treasure hunting, they will eventually start to break into other people's homes."
Jim bought Della a comb. Della bout Jim a platinum fob chain.
Answer:
Most people mentally visualize time as running either forward or backward.
Explanation: From the sentence above in B, we are able to deduce that people mentally visualize time as running either forward or backward. This is based on the research done on English and Aymara.
Answer: agent-relativity
Explanation: While there are several deolontogical theories, the agent-relative theory allows agents to give precedence to their own status, interests, and special relationships. Alhough every moral theory gives us the same aim of acting morally, there are those that gives us different substantive aims. The agent‐relative theory is one of these—as a moral theory it doesn't give every
agent the exact same set of substantive aims. In this it holds that an act is permissible if and only if it maximizes the agent’s utility.