"Without engaging in international trade, Freedonia and Lamponia would have been able to consume at the after-trade consumption bundles" is FALSE.
<u>Option:</u> B
<u>Explanation:</u>
Specialization refers to countries' propensity to focus in certain items they exchange for other commodities, rather than to manufacture all the consumer goods on their own. As the PPF production possibilities frontier displays that production is impractical, Freedonia and Lamponia had to engage in international trade.
Both countries are able to consume the goods they produce.When a country is skilled in manufacturing a good, it can manufacture this good at a lower cost of opportunity than its trading nation. For this comparative advantage, both countries benefit from competing and trading with one another.
Answer:
The answer is: a change in the price at which a substitute good is sold
Explanation:
A shift in supply means a change in the quantity supplied at every price.
Let's assume we sell product A. If the price of a substitute product B increases, then the quantity demanded for product A will increase as the quantity demanded for product B decreases. That will cause an increase in the quantity supplied of product A, which may in turn rise the price of product A until again both products (A and B) match their prices.
Instead, a shift in the supply curve means that the quantity supplied of a product will change at every price level.
Answer:
$136
Explanation:
Date Transaction Units Cost Total
3 Purchase 5 $20 $100
10 Sale 3
17 Purchase 10 $24 $240
20 Sale 6
23 Sale 3
30 Purchase 10 $30 $300
using the first in, first out method, the COGS is calculated based on the oldest price of the units in merchandise inventory:
6 units were sold on May 20th, 2 of them costed $20 (May 3rd purchase) per unit = $40, while 4 of them costed $24 (May 17th purchase) = $96. Total COGS = $40 + $96 = $136.
Hello,
Question - The U.S. Supreme Court case United States v. Bagley compels the prosecution to disclose any evidence that the _________ requests.
Answer - "evidence that the defense requests"
Why - "Bagley claimed that the government had violated his due process rights by withholding evidence that the defense could have utilized to impeach the witnesses. The district court held that the evidence was not material because the outcome would have been the same. "
Answer:
True
Explanation:
A more precise way to describe the situation is that Joe's pizza parlor is a monopolistic competition. But that definition considers that all 'food' items have some degree of close substitute relation.
But yes, if you consider this two conditions:
- a broad definition of monopoly
- other restaurants are not considered close substitutes for the food sold at the pizza parlor
Then yes, Joe has monopoly
