If an object accelerating at −1.5m/s^2 takes 1.2s to reach 5.0m/s, what was its initial speed?
1 answer:
You might be interested in
Answer:
1) Current decreases; 2) Inverse proportionally; 3) 1[A]
Explanation:
1)
As we can see as the resistance increases the current decreases, if we take two points as an example, when the resistance is equal to 50 [ohms] the current is equal to 1[amp] and when the resistance is equal to 200 [ohms] the current tends to have a value below 0.5 [amp]. Thus demonstrating the decrease in current.
2)
Inverse proportionally, by definition we know that the law of ohm determines the voltage according to resistance and amperage. This is the voltage will be equal to the product of the voltage by the resistance.
where:
And whenever we have in a fractional number the denominator the variable we are interested in, we can say that this is inversely proportional to the value we are interested in determining. In this case, we can see from the two previous expressions that both the current and the resistance appear in the denominator, therefore they are inversely proportional to each other.
3)
If we place ourselves on the graph on the resistance axis, we see that at 50 [ohm] will correspond a current value equal to 1 [A].
Answer:
Thus, if field were sampled at same distance, the field due to short wire is greater than field due to long wire.
Explanation:
The magnetic field, B of long straight wire can be obtained by applying ampere's law
I is here current, and r's the distance from the wire to the field of measurement.
The magnetic field is obviously directly proportional to the current wire. From this expression.
As the resistance of the long cable is proportional to the cable length, the short cable becomes less resilient than the long cable, so going through the short cable (where filled with the same material) is a bigger amount of currents. If the field is measured at the same time, the field is therefore larger than the long wire because of the short wire.