Answer:
One of the great dangers in allocating common fixed corporate costs is that such allocations can make a product line look less profitable than it really is.
Explanation:
Therefore, care must be exercised so that a product line is not eliminated because the common fixed costs have been allocated to it such that it becomes unprofitable. This is why it is necessary to identify activity cost pools into which such fixed costs can be accumulated and from which they can be allocated to product lines. Using ABC costing approach, for instance, offers a means of escape because the system tries to allocate costs based on the level of usage or consumption of such common costs by each product line instead of using arbitrary allocation formulas.
Due to the greatest cost of goods sold, the LIFO (Last In Last Out) technique displays the lowest net profitability. Compared to the other techniques of inventory valuation, the cost of goods sold for the LIFO approach is the greatest.
<h3>Which technique of inventory valuation will result in the lowest net profit?</h3>
The application of LIFO will produce the lowest net income and the greatest estimated cost of goods sold among the three options during periods of inflation.
<h3>Which method of inventory has the lowest income tax rate?</h3>
LIFO is the inventory cost flow method that yields the lowest income tax liability. A form of inventory cost flow mechanism called last-in-first-out (LIFO) operates under the presumption that the last item acquired will be the first item to be sold.
<h3>In an era of inflation, which inventory method results in the lowest income tax?</h3>
Due to increasing COGS, LIFO leads to reduced net income (and taxes). However, under LIFO during inflation, there are fewer inventory write-downs. Results from average cost are in the middle of FIFO and LIFO.
To Know more about techniques
brainly.com/question/13655064
#SPJ4
Answer:
The correct answer is the option B: This employee should be granted access based on his current and past roles only after being formally reviewed for his effectiveness in the company.
Explanation:
To begin with, if the employee has past through several positions before then he must understand quite a bit how the company works in its whole and moreover that employee must be trusted due to the fact of the times that he was promoted and therefore that he must have granted access based on his current and past roles but only after being formally reviewed because of the fact of ensuring the effectiveness of the employee.
<span>a sum of money sent or in payment for goods or services or as a gift.
</span>
Answer:
Option (D) 16.57%
Explanation:
Data provided in the question:
Realized gain
r₁ = 20%
r₂ = 20%
r₃ = 10%
Now,
Geometric average = ![[(1+r_1)\times(1+r_2)\times...\times(1+r_n)]^{\frac{1}{n}}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5B%281%2Br_1%29%5Ctimes%281%2Br_2%29%5Ctimes...%5Ctimes%281%2Br_n%29%5D%5E%7B%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7Bn%7D%7D)
- 1
here,
n = 3
therefore,
Geometric average = ![[(1+0.20)\times(1+0.20)\times(1+0.10)]^{\frac{1}{3}}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5B%281%2B0.20%29%5Ctimes%281%2B0.20%29%5Ctimes%281%2B0.10%29%5D%5E%7B%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B3%7D%7D)
- 1
or
Geometric average = ![[1.584]^{\frac{1}{3}}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5B1.584%5D%5E%7B%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B3%7D%7D)
- 1
or
Geometric average = 1.1657 - 1
or
Geometric average = 0.1657
= 0.1657 × 100%
= 16.57%
