Government regulations help balance negative externalities such as no smoking rules enforced to mitigate the effects of second-hand smoke.
<h3>What is negative externality?</h3>
Negative externality is when the activities of producers or consumers negatively affect third parties not involved in production or consumption activities.
For example, smoking affects those who are not smoking. They are affected by the second-hand smoke. To prevent this, no smoking rules can be enforced.
To learn more about externalities, please check: brainly.com/question/26266710
Answer: $27.47
Explanation:
Given: Growth rate = 4.70% per year = 0.0470 per year
Dividend of next year = $2.50
Expected rate of return on Stock = 13.80% =0.1380
Current price = (Dividend of next year ) ÷ (Expected rate - Growth rate)
= (2.50)÷ (0.1380-0.0470)
= (2.50) ÷ (0.091)
≈ $27.47
Hence, you will pay $27.47 for the company's stock today.
Answer:
C. a derived demand.
Explanation:
Derived demand is a rise in the demand of a product due to the increase in demand for related or intermediate goods. If two distinct goods or services are used together, a rise in the demand of one will cause the demand for the other to rise. Products or services used together are called complementary goods.
Derived demand is primarily as a result of the usage of a product in the production or consumption of other goods or services. In this case, the demand for workers is solely due to a rise in the demand for cars. Should the demand for vehicles decrease, then the demand for workers will fall.
<u>Solution and Explanation:</u>
Amount realized 22,000 Minus: Basis 89,000 Loss recognized 67000
<u>answer a </u>) Since Karen is single she can guarantee this lose as a common misfortune to a limit of $50,000. Karen won't have the option to guarantee the whole $67,000 that she lost she can just guarantee $50,000.
<u>answer b) </u>Since Karen is recording a joint government form she can guarantee a lose of upto $100,000. Karen will have the option to guarantee the whole loss of $67,000.
<u>answer c )</u> With the stock being bought from another investor as opposed to the sorting out enterprise she can guarantee the whole loss of $67,000 as a captial gain misfortune.
<u>answer d )</u> B. By selling a segment of the stock in one year and the staying stock in one more year Karen could change over the whole misfortune on the deal to a normal misfortune.
The answer is C they but at a discount, the entire issues of new security....
